header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024 / Andrew Young
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

Substance trumps procedure

182210
Tort in Spain, claim in England—should interest be awarded at the higher rate as stipulated by Spanish law? Andrew Young reports
  • Covers the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre, concerning claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre for accidents in Spain. Liability was admitted and damages assessed under Spanish law.
  • Addresses question of whether the English court should award interest at the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law (art 20(4) of Spanish Insurance Contract Act 50/1980).
  • The answer might depend on whether the award of interest was substantive (Spanish law) or procedural (either English or Spanish, at the court’s discretion).
  • The Court of Appeal held the interest payable was a matter of substance, so the higher Spanish rate applied.

On 27 June 2024 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in three conjoined appeals (Nicholls v Mapfre Espana Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718, [2024] All ER (D) 28 (Jul)), all of which were brought by the Spanish insurance company

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll