header-logo header-logo

15 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Sue Adams—Steele Raymond LLP

sue_adams_partner_steele_raymond_llp_2

New tax partner for Dorset firm

Dorset commercial law firm Steele Raymond LLP has announced the appointment of new partner Sue Adams. Sue will join the tax team, reinforcing its position as one of the strongest tax teams in a law firm in Dorset.

Sue is dual-qualified as a solicitor and chartered tax adviser, and has many years’ experience in all aspects of private client work. She is a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP), and holds a distinction in the STEP advanced diploma in UK tax for international clients. 

Sue’s expertise includes inheritance tax and capital gains tax advice and planning (in particular for farming and business clients), the creation and taxation of trusts, and advising small business owners in relation to tax and succession planning. She advises in relation to a number of offshore issues, including offshore trusts and tax planning for non UK domiciled individuals. 

She also deals with estate planning and estate administration, drafting wills, advising on charitable trusts, advising on and creating lasting powers of attorney and making applications in the Court of Protection. Sue is also a member of Solicitors for the Elderly. 

Sue says: “I’m very happy to be returning to Bournemouth and to Steele Raymond where I was previously a partner for many years. The firm has a strong commercial focus that is unrivalled in the Dorset region, and I’m looking forward to working with its wide range of business clients and the exceptional individuals who run them.” 

Chairman Tim Stone adds: "I’m delighted to be welcoming Sue to the team, an appointment that demonstrates our commitment to hiring the region’s best people. Sue’s experience will significantly boost our tax team’s offshore and international expertise and consolidate our top tier range of services, ensuring Steele Raymond remains the best choice regionally for commercial law.”

 

Issue: 7622 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll