header-logo header-logo

Sum of constituent parts

22 May 2008 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Will the government's constitutional reforms make state power more accountable? Mark Ryan reports

In July 2007, Jack Straw MP, the secretary of state for justice and lord chancellor, unveiled a green paper (The Governance of Britain, Cm 7170) which set out to promote “a national conversation” on even further reform of the constitution. The foreword stated that the government wanted “to forge a new relationship between government and citizen, and begin the journey towards a new constitutional settlement—a settlement that entrusts parliament and the people with more power”. In particular, the green paper was concerned with making state power more accountable and enhancing citizens' rights and responsibilities. This was followed by the publication of consultation documents designed to engage the public and other interested parties in shaping the proposed constitutional changes.

On 25 March 2008, Straw made a statement in the House of Commons about the government's programme of constitutional renewal and he announced the publication of three documents:

  •   
    ●     A white paper on constitutional renewal (The Governance of Britain—Constitutional
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll