header-logo header-logo

Sum of constituent parts

22 May 2008 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Will the government's constitutional reforms make state power more accountable? Mark Ryan reports

In July 2007, Jack Straw MP, the secretary of state for justice and lord chancellor, unveiled a green paper (The Governance of Britain, Cm 7170) which set out to promote “a national conversation” on even further reform of the constitution. The foreword stated that the government wanted “to forge a new relationship between government and citizen, and begin the journey towards a new constitutional settlement—a settlement that entrusts parliament and the people with more power”. In particular, the green paper was concerned with making state power more accountable and enhancing citizens' rights and responsibilities. This was followed by the publication of consultation documents designed to engage the public and other interested parties in shaping the proposed constitutional changes.

On 25 March 2008, Straw made a statement in the House of Commons about the government's programme of constitutional renewal and he announced the publication of three documents:

  •   
    ●     A white paper on constitutional renewal (The Governance of Britain—Constitutional
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll