header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Sum of constituent parts

Will the government's constitutional reforms make state power more accountable? Mark Ryan reports

In July 2007, Jack Straw MP, the secretary of state for justice and lord chancellor, unveiled a green paper (The Governance of Britain, Cm 7170) which set out to promote “a national conversation” on even further reform of the constitution. The foreword stated that the government wanted “to forge a new relationship between government and citizen, and begin the journey towards a new constitutional settlement—a settlement that entrusts parliament and the people with more power”. In particular, the green paper was concerned with making state power more accountable and enhancing citizens' rights and responsibilities. This was followed by the publication of consultation documents designed to engage the public and other interested parties in shaping the proposed constitutional changes.

On 25 March 2008, Straw made a statement in the House of Commons about the government's programme of constitutional renewal and he announced the publication of three documents:

  •   
    ●     A white paper on constitutional renewal (The Governance of Britain—Constitutional
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll