header-logo header-logo

Summary assessment on decree

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

I have adopted a practice on applications for decree nisi where there is an unopposed prayer for costs of lodging a statement of costs and asking for summary assessment so that a costs order for the assessed sum can be made on pronouncement of decree but there is judicial resistance to this. What is the problem?

In principle, there is no reason why a party should not seek summary assessment of costs claimed on the grant of a decree under the standard (undefended) procedure. However, the usual time period of 24 hours for serving a schedule of costs (CPR PD 44, para 9.5(4)) will not be sufficient to enable the other party to attend and make representations, since at least 14 days’ notice must be given of an intention to attend (FPR 7.21(2)). If summary assessment is to be sought this must be made clear when the application for decree nisi is made so that a suitable time estimate can be given for the assessment to be conducted on pronouncement or at a separate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll