header-logo header-logo

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Summary assessment on decree

I have adopted a practice on applications for decree nisi where there is an unopposed prayer for costs of lodging a statement of costs and asking for summary assessment so that a costs order for the assessed sum can be made on pronouncement of decree but there is judicial resistance to this. What is the problem?

In principle, there is no reason why a party should not seek summary assessment of costs claimed on the grant of a decree under the standard (undefended) procedure. However, the usual time period of 24 hours for serving a schedule of costs (CPR PD 44, para 9.5(4)) will not be sufficient to enable the other party to attend and make representations, since at least 14 days’ notice must be given of an intention to attend (FPR 7.21(2)). If summary assessment is to be sought this must be made clear when the application for decree nisi is made so that a suitable time estimate can be given for the assessment to be conducted on pronouncement or at a separate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll