header-logo header-logo

07 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Surrogacy update planned

Insufficient regulation & lack of clarity means current laws ‘no longer fit for purpose’

Surrogacy laws would be overhauled, regulation and oversight tightened, and intended parents given rights at birth, under radical reforms proposed by the Law Commission.

Surrogacy is currently legal in the UK, but the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission believe the laws are outdated. Under their proposals, intended parents would be allowed to become legal parents when the child is born rather than having to apply to court for a parental order, which can take several months. The surrogate would retain a right to object for a short period after the birth.

A regulator would be created to oversee surrogacy organisations, and a national register would be set up to allow those born of surrogacy arrangements to access information about their origins. All parties entering into a surrogacy arrangement would be required to have counselling and take independent legal advice, to reduce the risk of the arrangement breaking down.

The Law Commissions have not put forward any proposals regarding payment of the surrogate, although they do propose that surrogacy organisations remain non-profit. Instead, the consultation asks questions around the categories of payment that intended parents should be able to make.

Launching the 498-page consultation, ‘Building families through surrogacy’, this week, Law Commission chair Sir Nicholas Green said: ‘More and more people are turning to surrogacy to have a child and start their family.

‘However, the laws around surrogacy are outdated and no longer fit for purpose. We think our proposals will create a system that works for the surrogates, the parents and, most importantly, the child.’

The law governing surrogacy came into effect in the 1980s. The two Commissions believe there is insufficient regulation, making it difficult to monitor the surrogacy process and ensure standards are maintained. For example, intended parents can legally pay ‘reasonable expenses’ to the surrogate, but this is unclear and difficult to apply in practice.

Lady Paton, chair of the Scottish Law Commission, said: ‘Surrogacy has become a significant issue in today’s society. The interests of all the parties involved must be properly regulated and protected. That is the focus of our proposals.’

The consultation closes on 27 September 2019.

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll