header-logo header-logo

Surrogacy update planned

07 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
Insufficient regulation & lack of clarity means current laws ‘no longer fit for purpose’

Surrogacy laws would be overhauled, regulation and oversight tightened, and intended parents given rights at birth, under radical reforms proposed by the Law Commission.

Surrogacy is currently legal in the UK, but the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission believe the laws are outdated. Under their proposals, intended parents would be allowed to become legal parents when the child is born rather than having to apply to court for a parental order, which can take several months. The surrogate would retain a right to object for a short period after the birth.

A regulator would be created to oversee surrogacy organisations, and a national register would be set up to allow those born of surrogacy arrangements to access information about their origins. All parties entering into a surrogacy arrangement would be required to have counselling and take independent legal advice, to reduce the risk of the arrangement breaking down.

The Law Commissions have not put forward any proposals regarding payment of the surrogate, although they do propose that surrogacy organisations remain non-profit. Instead, the consultation asks questions around the categories of payment that intended parents should be able to make.

Launching the 498-page consultation, ‘Building families through surrogacy’, this week, Law Commission chair Sir Nicholas Green said: ‘More and more people are turning to surrogacy to have a child and start their family.

‘However, the laws around surrogacy are outdated and no longer fit for purpose. We think our proposals will create a system that works for the surrogates, the parents and, most importantly, the child.’

The law governing surrogacy came into effect in the 1980s. The two Commissions believe there is insufficient regulation, making it difficult to monitor the surrogacy process and ensure standards are maintained. For example, intended parents can legally pay ‘reasonable expenses’ to the surrogate, but this is unclear and difficult to apply in practice.

Lady Paton, chair of the Scottish Law Commission, said: ‘Surrogacy has become a significant issue in today’s society. The interests of all the parties involved must be properly regulated and protected. That is the focus of our proposals.’

The consultation closes on 27 September 2019.

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll