header-logo header-logo

Surrogacy update planned

07 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
Insufficient regulation & lack of clarity means current laws ‘no longer fit for purpose’

Surrogacy laws would be overhauled, regulation and oversight tightened, and intended parents given rights at birth, under radical reforms proposed by the Law Commission.

Surrogacy is currently legal in the UK, but the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission believe the laws are outdated. Under their proposals, intended parents would be allowed to become legal parents when the child is born rather than having to apply to court for a parental order, which can take several months. The surrogate would retain a right to object for a short period after the birth.

A regulator would be created to oversee surrogacy organisations, and a national register would be set up to allow those born of surrogacy arrangements to access information about their origins. All parties entering into a surrogacy arrangement would be required to have counselling and take independent legal advice, to reduce the risk of the arrangement breaking down.

The Law Commissions have not put forward any proposals regarding payment of the surrogate, although they do propose that surrogacy organisations remain non-profit. Instead, the consultation asks questions around the categories of payment that intended parents should be able to make.

Launching the 498-page consultation, ‘Building families through surrogacy’, this week, Law Commission chair Sir Nicholas Green said: ‘More and more people are turning to surrogacy to have a child and start their family.

‘However, the laws around surrogacy are outdated and no longer fit for purpose. We think our proposals will create a system that works for the surrogates, the parents and, most importantly, the child.’

The law governing surrogacy came into effect in the 1980s. The two Commissions believe there is insufficient regulation, making it difficult to monitor the surrogacy process and ensure standards are maintained. For example, intended parents can legally pay ‘reasonable expenses’ to the surrogate, but this is unclear and difficult to apply in practice.

Lady Paton, chair of the Scottish Law Commission, said: ‘Surrogacy has become a significant issue in today’s society. The interests of all the parties involved must be properly regulated and protected. That is the focus of our proposals.’

The consultation closes on 27 September 2019.

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll