header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Surveyors and MPs escalate HIPs controversy

An 11th hour wave of opposition to home information packs (HIPs) was taking hold this week as MPs demanded that the controversial initiative be scrapped.

HIPs, which provide potential buyers with information about a house and an energy performance certificate, are due to come into force on 1 June.
Opponents question their benefit to the consumer and say they add between £300 and £500 to the cost of selling a home.

MPs were due to attend a Commons debate calling for the HIPs regulations to be annulled this week following the tabling of a motion by Conservative leader, David Cameron.

Meanwhile, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) is bringing judicial review proceedings against the Department for Communities and Local Government for its alleged failure to properly consult before implementing legislation to bring in HIPs. RICS’ concerns include the lack of energy inspectors, regulation, and the impact of the scheme on the housing market.

Teresa Graham, chair of RICS’ regulatory board, says: “We have exhausted all the alternatives and greatly regret that we

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll