header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Suspending possession

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order...

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order a suspended or postponed order for possession by consent of the parties even though it would lack jurisdiction to suspend or postpone in the absence of consent?

The landlord can chose to abandon a mandatory ground for possession which could only lead to an outright order (like ground 8 under the Housing Act 1988) and instead rely on a discretionary ground which can lead to a suspended or postponed order (like grounds 10 or 11). If, however, the law does not afford the court a discretion to suspend or postpone (as with trespassers, for example) then the parties cannot vest it with a discretion by giving their consent to an order. Nevertheless, it is still possible for the landlord to undertake that he will not enforce an order for possession for a certain period or so long as certain conditions are complied with and the undertaking can be incorporated as a recital in the preamble to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll