header-logo header-logo

Suspending possession

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order...

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order a suspended or postponed order for possession by consent of the parties even though it would lack jurisdiction to suspend or postpone in the absence of consent?

The landlord can chose to abandon a mandatory ground for possession which could only lead to an outright order (like ground 8 under the Housing Act 1988) and instead rely on a discretionary ground which can lead to a suspended or postponed order (like grounds 10 or 11). If, however, the law does not afford the court a discretion to suspend or postpone (as with trespassers, for example) then the parties cannot vest it with a discretion by giving their consent to an order. Nevertheless, it is still possible for the landlord to undertake that he will not enforce an order for possession for a certain period or so long as certain conditions are complied with and the undertaking can be incorporated as a recital in the preamble to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll