header-logo header-logo

Suspicions, privacy & money laundering

20 October 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7766_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC & Anita Clifford put the new arrangements for money laundering under the spotlight

  • The new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion.
  • The ability for a court to extend the moratorium period when a suspicious activity report is filed.

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 has introduced important changes to the anti-money laundering regime for the reporting of suspicious activity under Pt 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2012). Two changes which will have a significant practical impact on lawyers, estate agents and financial sector professionals, who comprise the regulated sector, are the new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion, and the ability for a court to extend the moratorium or ‘no action’ period applying to a matter when a suspicious activity report (SAR) is filed.

Underlying both new frameworks is an intention to make the investigation of criminal property laundered through the UK easier. However, the open-textured nature of some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll