header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Suspicions, privacy & money laundering

nlj_7766_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC & Anita Clifford put the new arrangements for money laundering under the spotlight

  • The new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion.
  • The ability for a court to extend the moratorium period when a suspicious activity report is filed.

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 has introduced important changes to the anti-money laundering regime for the reporting of suspicious activity under Pt 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2012). Two changes which will have a significant practical impact on lawyers, estate agents and financial sector professionals, who comprise the regulated sector, are the new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion, and the ability for a court to extend the moratorium or ‘no action’ period applying to a matter when a suspicious activity report (SAR) is filed.

Underlying both new frameworks is an intention to make the investigation of criminal property laundered through the UK easier. However, the open-textured nature of some of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll