header-logo header-logo

Suspicions, privacy & money laundering

20 October 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7766_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC & Anita Clifford put the new arrangements for money laundering under the spotlight

  • The new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion.
  • The ability for a court to extend the moratorium period when a suspicious activity report is filed.

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 has introduced important changes to the anti-money laundering regime for the reporting of suspicious activity under Pt 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2012). Two changes which will have a significant practical impact on lawyers, estate agents and financial sector professionals, who comprise the regulated sector, are the new ability for regulated persons to share information relating to a money laundering suspicion, and the ability for a court to extend the moratorium or ‘no action’ period applying to a matter when a suspicious activity report (SAR) is filed.

Underlying both new frameworks is an intention to make the investigation of criminal property laundered through the UK easier. However, the open-textured nature of some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll