header-logo header-logo

27 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Tagore Investments SA v Official Receiver [2009] All ER (D) 63 (Jan)

In exercising its discretion under s 346(6) of the Insolvency Act 1986, the court must have regard to the extent to which, and the reasons for which, the enforcement of the judgment had been frustrated. The emphasis should be on post-judgment events. However, prejudgment events might be considered if they enable the court to draw an inference as to the motivation behind postjudgment events that might otherwise not be a proper inference to draw. The jurisdiction under s 346(6) should be exercised only in exceptional cases. The applicant must establish that the events which have happened have generated sufficient unfairness to generate an exception in his favour.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll