header-logo header-logo

27 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Tagore Investments SA v Official Receiver [2009] All ER (D) 63 (Jan)

In exercising its discretion under s 346(6) of the Insolvency Act 1986, the court must have regard to the extent to which, and the reasons for which, the enforcement of the judgment had been frustrated. The emphasis should be on post-judgment events. However, prejudgment events might be considered if they enable the court to draw an inference as to the motivation behind postjudgment events that might otherwise not be a proper inference to draw. The jurisdiction under s 346(6) should be exercised only in exceptional cases. The applicant must establish that the events which have happened have generated sufficient unfairness to generate an exception in his favour.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll