header-logo header-logo

27 February 2009 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Tagore Investments SA v Official Receiver [2009] All ER (D) 63 (Jan)

In exercising its discretion under s 346(6) of the Insolvency Act 1986, the court must have regard to the extent to which, and the reasons for which, the enforcement of the judgment had been frustrated. The emphasis should be on post-judgment events. However, prejudgment events might be considered if they enable the court to draw an inference as to the motivation behind postjudgment events that might otherwise not be a proper inference to draw. The jurisdiction under s 346(6) should be exercised only in exceptional cases. The applicant must establish that the events which have happened have generated sufficient unfairness to generate an exception in his favour.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll