header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009 / Joanna Sykes
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail

Taken for granted

Joanna Sykes on the scope of the doctrine of non-derogation from grant
 

In 1975 Lord Denning stated the principle of non-derogation from grant: “If one man agrees to confer a particular benefit on another, he must not do anything which substantially deprives the other of the enjoyment of that benefi t, because that would be to take away with one hand what is given with the other.”

In the context of landlords and tenants, where a landlord lets land for a specific purpose, then it is under an obligation not to take any steps as regards its retained land which would render the demised premises unfit or unsuitable for the purpose for which they were let.

The problem with this doctrine is that it is founded in case law and as such there is some uncertainty as to its scope and application. Certainly its scope is not confined to real estate, but for the purposes of this article I shall limit the discussion to landlord and tenant matters.
The courts have not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll