header-logo header-logo

01 November 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Taking care in the public interest

Accountable Care Organisations: a new model for the provision of health & social care? Nicholas Dobson reports

  • The proposals by the Secretary of State and the NHS for Accountable Care Organisations are lawful.
  • The policy development point has not yet been reached where the principles of transparency and clarity apply.

What are Accountable Care Organisations (ACOs) and why should public lawyers be interested? Perhaps because on 5 July 2018 Green J gave an important judgment on what he thought was ‘an issue of great public interest’. This was whether the Secretary of State and NHS England could lawfully introduce the ACO as a new model for the provision of health and social care.

A House of Commons Briefing Paper (issued 6 July 2018) indicated that an ACO is ‘an area-based model of healthcare provision, where a single body takes responsibility for the health needs of its entire population’. According to the paper, ACOs usually involve one or more providers collaborating to meet the needs of a defined area and taking responsibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll