header-logo header-logo

18 January 2013 / John Summers
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Taking sides

hires_6_3

John Summers considers two recent important property law decisions

This update scrutinises Yeates v Line [2012] EWHC 3085 (Ch)—a decision of the High Court which considers whether certain statutory formalities apply to agreements concluded in settlement of boundary disputes—and Pankhania v Chandegra [2012] EWCA Civ 1438, a Court of Appeal decision which considers the effect of an express declaration of trust on a subsequent claim to a different beneficial share in the subject property.

Yeates v Line

In early 2011, the appellants (AS) made an application to the Land Registry to have the registered title to certain land (the land) altered to show them as proprietors. AS alleged that they had acquired title to the land by adverse possession. The registered owners of the land were the respondents (RS) who objected to the application. The dispute was referred to the adjudicator to the Land Registry. Although she found that AS had been in adverse possession as alleged, she declined to order alteration of the register on the basis that the parties had reached

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll