header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

R (on the application of Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] All ER (D) 157 (Oct)

“Residence” was not defined in statute. The definition of “reside” adopted by the courts was that of a “settled or usual abode”. An individual who had been resident in the UK ceased in law to be so resident only if he ceased to have a settled or usual abode in the UK. The phrase “a distinct break” was not an inapt description of the degree of change in the pattern of an individual’s life in the UK which would be necessary if a cessation of his settled or usual abode in the UK was to take place. Section 334 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 had the effect that, if an individual who had been resident and ordinarily resident in the UK, ceases to be resident in the UK, he would nevertheless be deemed to have remained resident in the UK if he had left the UK for the purpose only of occasional residence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll