header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

R (on the application of Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] All ER (D) 157 (Oct)

“Residence” was not defined in statute. The definition of “reside” adopted by the courts was that of a “settled or usual abode”. An individual who had been resident in the UK ceased in law to be so resident only if he ceased to have a settled or usual abode in the UK. The phrase “a distinct break” was not an inapt description of the degree of change in the pattern of an individual’s life in the UK which would be necessary if a cessation of his settled or usual abode in the UK was to take place. Section 334 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 had the effect that, if an individual who had been resident and ordinarily resident in the UK, ceases to be resident in the UK, he would nevertheless be deemed to have remained resident in the UK if he had left the UK for the purpose only of occasional residence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll