header-logo header-logo

Tax

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 47, [2011] All ER (D) 157 (Oct)

“Residence” was not defined in statute. The definition of “reside” adopted by the courts was that of a “settled or usual abode”. An individual who had been resident in the UK ceased in law to be so resident only if he ceased to have a settled or usual abode in the UK. The phrase “a distinct break” was not an inapt description of the degree of change in the pattern of an individual’s life in the UK which would be necessary if a cessation of his settled or usual abode in the UK was to take place. Section 334 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 had the effect that, if an individual who had been resident and ordinarily resident in the UK, ceases to be resident in the UK, he would nevertheless be deemed to have remained resident in the UK if he had left the UK for the purpose only of occasional residence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll