header-logo header-logo

22 May 2026 / Stephen Horscroft
Issue: 8162 / Categories: Features , Trusts , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail

Tax matters

250389
© Getty images
Disabled person’s trust or standard discretionary trust? Stephen Horscroft explores strategic considerations for modern estate planning
  • Disabled person’s trusts can provide substantial inheritance tax, income tax and capital gains tax (CGT) advantages while protecting means-tested benefits, but only where strict statutory eligibility requirements are satisfied.
  • Standard discretionary trusts remain valuable where flexibility, wider family benefit or CGT holdover relief are priorities, making the choice of structure highly dependent on the client’s long-term objectives and family circumstances.

Families who wish to provide for a vulnerable or disabled beneficiary are presented with the challenge of how to deliver lasting financial protection without undermining vital state support or exposing the individual to financial risk. Trust structures are central to this planning, but the distinctions between disabled person’s trusts (which benefit from the bespoke tax regime in s 89 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984) and a standard discretionary trust need careful consideration. Deciding which structure works best in the circumstances requires a nuanced understanding of tax regimes, statutory definitions of disability, and the client’s circumstances

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll