header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

nlj_7659_vaines

Peter Vaines explores the ins and outs of non-residents capital gains tax

We now have the non-residents capital gains tax in place and I think we can be sure it will never go away. Taxes rarely do (although I do remember development land tax being abolished in 1985).

Most non-residents who have an interest in a UK residential property will now be liable to capital gains tax on its disposal. This might catch out a few non-residents because it will also apply to disposals by way of gift and to deemed disposals. We know all about those concepts here, but they might come as a shock to some foreign owners who are unfamiliar with the principles of UK tax.

However, the tax will only be chargeable on the increase in value from 6 April 2015. This will be done either by rebasing or by an election for time apportionment. A frequent question is whether the client should obtain a professional valuation on 6 April 2015 for the purposes of the new charge.

HMRC recommend a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll