header-logo header-logo

11 December 2015 / Martin Burns , Brendan Van Rooyen
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Team building

nlj_7680_burns

Leading industry bodies have joined together to reduce conflict in the construction & engineering industry, say Brendan Van Rooyen & Martin Burns

The Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) and the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DRBF) have formed an alliance in response to the rising financial cost of disputes in the construction and engineering industry, and growing desire to explore new forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

Stalled negotiations

Disputes in the construction and engineering sector are often the result of minor issues escalating over time into more serious issues. When this happens meaningful negotiations can stall and positions become entrenched. Lots of people and money can be thrown into the fray, with little or no success.

People at the heart of disputes, who understand the issues and are best placed to negotiate settlement, may no longer speak to each other, except through lawyers or claims consultants. Costs can escalate out of control, and more and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll