header-logo header-logo

Tell it like it is

07 April 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7741_dobson

There are reasons for giving reasons in planning decisions, says Nicholas Dobson

  • While there is no general obligation to give reasons for granting planning permission, such reasons are likely to be necessary if the committee changes its mind, departs from officer recommendations or gives permission for development in the Green Belt or in breach of the development plan.

“Never”, advised former Lord Chief Justice Lord Mansfield, “give your reasons; for your judgment will probably be right, but your reasons will certainly be wrong”. Public law has of course moved on a touch since Lord Mansfield’s 18th century advice to a newly appointed colonial governor. But to what extent does a planning authority have to give reasons for granting planning consent—in particular for a development in the Green Belt against officer advice?

That was the issue in a decision of the Court of Appeal on 15 February 2017: Oakley v South Cambridgeshire DC & another [2017] EWCA Civ 71. In the circumstances this found a common law duty requiring the council

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll