header-logo header-logo

Tell it like it is

07 April 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7741_dobson

There are reasons for giving reasons in planning decisions, says Nicholas Dobson

  • While there is no general obligation to give reasons for granting planning permission, such reasons are likely to be necessary if the committee changes its mind, departs from officer recommendations or gives permission for development in the Green Belt or in breach of the development plan.

“Never”, advised former Lord Chief Justice Lord Mansfield, “give your reasons; for your judgment will probably be right, but your reasons will certainly be wrong”. Public law has of course moved on a touch since Lord Mansfield’s 18th century advice to a newly appointed colonial governor. But to what extent does a planning authority have to give reasons for granting planning consent—in particular for a development in the Green Belt against officer advice?

That was the issue in a decision of the Court of Appeal on 15 February 2017: Oakley v South Cambridgeshire DC & another [2017] EWCA Civ 71. In the circumstances this found a common law duty requiring the council

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll