header-logo header-logo

Tell it like it is

07 April 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7741_dobson

There are reasons for giving reasons in planning decisions, says Nicholas Dobson

  • While there is no general obligation to give reasons for granting planning permission, such reasons are likely to be necessary if the committee changes its mind, departs from officer recommendations or gives permission for development in the Green Belt or in breach of the development plan.

“Never”, advised former Lord Chief Justice Lord Mansfield, “give your reasons; for your judgment will probably be right, but your reasons will certainly be wrong”. Public law has of course moved on a touch since Lord Mansfield’s 18th century advice to a newly appointed colonial governor. But to what extent does a planning authority have to give reasons for granting planning consent—in particular for a development in the Green Belt against officer advice?

That was the issue in a decision of the Court of Appeal on 15 February 2017: Oakley v South Cambridgeshire DC & another [2017] EWCA Civ 71. In the circumstances this found a common law duty requiring the council

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll