header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Tenants' repair despair

Anthony Judge discusses tenants' repair costs in the light of Watson v Jackson

 

As readers will remember from the judgment in Jackson v Watson [2008] EWHC 14 earlier this year, the unfortunate tenant Mr Jackson spent several thousand pounds repairing damage to his basement flat caused by leaks from some light wells located outside his demise. The parties agreed that these leaks occurred because the concrete encasing the grills connected to a downpipe outside these light wells had been laid defectively when the property was converted into flats before the date of the lease. The High Court decided that the landlord was not liable for the tenant's repair costs, first because the tenant had no contractual claim against his landlord and second because the principle of “caveat lessee” overrode any possible tortious claim of nuisance that Mr Jackson might have had against his landlord.

This article will examine these two strands of reasoning from the perspective of a commercial tenants' lawyer wishing to protect his clients as much as possible from this sort of irrecoverable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll