header-logo header-logo

Tenants' repair despair

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Anthony Judge discusses tenants' repair costs in the light of Watson v Jackson

 

As readers will remember from the judgment in Jackson v Watson [2008] EWHC 14 earlier this year, the unfortunate tenant Mr Jackson spent several thousand pounds repairing damage to his basement flat caused by leaks from some light wells located outside his demise. The parties agreed that these leaks occurred because the concrete encasing the grills connected to a downpipe outside these light wells had been laid defectively when the property was converted into flats before the date of the lease. The High Court decided that the landlord was not liable for the tenant's repair costs, first because the tenant had no contractual claim against his landlord and second because the principle of “caveat lessee” overrode any possible tortious claim of nuisance that Mr Jackson might have had against his landlord.

This article will examine these two strands of reasoning from the perspective of a commercial tenants' lawyer wishing to protect his clients as much as possible from this sort of irrecoverable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll