header-logo header-logo

27 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Terrorism

Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2016] EWCA Civ 452, [2016] All ER (D) 82 (May)

The Court of Appeal allowed in part an appeal by the Treasury against the judge’s determination of a preliminary issue regarding the claimant bank’s entitlement to claim directly against the Treasury for the loss of earnings suffered by another bank of which the claimant was a 60% shareholder (PIB). PIB had standing to bring its own claim pursuant to s 63 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 and s 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Further, the claimant had no standing to bring the claim as a matter of Strasbourg case law.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll