header-logo header-logo

18 July 2019 / Rebecca Dziobon , Gemma Reading
Issue: 7849 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs
printer mail-detail

The costs-consequences pendulum shifts again

A low-key change to procedure means courts are more likely to make a costs order against a party who litigates unreasonably, write Rebecca Dziobon & Gemma Reading

  • Costs in financial remedy proceedings and the amendment to PD 28A para 4.4.

On 27 May 2019, there was a change made to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR) Practice Direction 28A para 4.4 as to the approach of the court when considering the conduct of the parties. This change went largely unnoticed, but its implications are that it is more likely that a court will make a costs order against a party who litigates unreasonably. This change will be welcomed by reasonable litigants and their legal advisers seeking to keep financial proceedings proportionate and on track for settlement.

The no order as to costs principle

FPR rule 28.1 provides that the court may at any time make such an order as to costs as it thinks just.

The general stating point under FPR 28.3(5) is that in financial remedy proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick McDonnell, Kain Knight

NLJ Career Profile: Nick McDonnell, Kain Knight

Nick McDonnell of Kain Knight reflects on an unexpected legal career, his drive to support vulnerable clients and the surprising pleasures of watching nothing happen

Mayo Wynne Baxter—Angela Arnold

Mayo Wynne Baxter—Angela Arnold

Mayo Wynne Baxter strengthens property team with new partner appointment

WilmerHale—Jeremy Kosky & Charlie Lightfoot

WilmerHale—Jeremy Kosky & Charlie Lightfoot

WilmerHale expands London disputes capabilities with addition of two leading partners

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed the Lord Chancellor’s reverse-ferret on jury reforms, but expressed ‘serious concerns’ about the decision to exclude fraud trials
From ‘rats in the robing room’ to ‘overworked’ judges and a shortage of court staff, barristers have aired their concerns about the state of the justice system
The use of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) poses ‘significant risks’ across the justice system, public services and government, and current regulation is ‘poorly suited’ to control it, experts have warned
The solicitors’ regulator has paused controversial plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
The government has launched a £16m legal support grant to support 48 frontline legal advice organisations supporting people facing eviction, problem debt, benefit disputes and family breakdown
back-to-top-scroll