header-logo header-logo

The Family Court of the Future

12 August 2020 / Sheena Cassidy Hope
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail
25807
Remote hearings, video hearings or no hearing at all? Sheena Cassidy Hope considers how the family courts might evolve

In brief

  • New ways of working could present opportunities for a more streamlined, 21st century Family Court.
  • Changes must ensure that access to justice is properly maintained, particularly for the most vulnerable in society.

Reform of the Family Court is not a new topic. The current HMCTS reform programme was launched in 2016, with a stated vision of modernising and upgrading the justice system so that it works better for all users. While the increased use of online applications, a move towards paperless courts and ‘fully’ video hearings were key aspects of the reform programme, few could have anticipated these becoming widespread practice within a matter of weeks (and in some instances, days). But with the lockdown imposed in March by the Government to suppress the spread of COVID-19 causing the courts, legal profession and litigants to unexpectedly partake in a sudden and unorthodox pilot, to what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll