header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The insider: 19 March 2021

42768
Whiplash reform, class action claims & risky rule changes: Dominic Regan provides the inside scoop

Personal injury reform

In my last (which was also my first) column, I suggested that the personal injury small claims reforms might suffer a bump or two themselves (see NLJ, 12 February 2021, p6). While we now know that the whiplash reforms will come into effect on 31 May, it is gratifying to see that other injury claims are to be left alone after all. I know the Ministry of Justice says that further reforms are possible. The department might look at fixed costs for cases worth between £25,000 and £100,000. The Ministry promised to publish final proposals no later than 6 September 2019. It didn’t and hasn’t.

On employers’ liability cases, we saw the Association of British Insurers combine with Thompsons Solicitors to declare that neither side wanted change. There was no evidence of fraudulent claims and the respective lawyers got on very well.

Incidentally, it was Stephen Gold, legendary columnist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll