header-logo header-logo

The law on abortion—time to re-think?

19 March 2020 / Nicholas Whitehorn , Letitia Egan
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail
17911
Letitia Egan & Nicholas Whitehorn review the evidence for reforming the abortion law in the UK
  • The anachronistic wording of s 58 OAPA 1861 renders the mens rea dangerously unclear and, worse still, risks criminalising vulnerable women.

For most parts of the UK, the issue of abortion appears to be a settled debate, but in reality it is a topic which continues to stir passions. This is something Labour leadership hopeful Rebecca Long-Bailey discovered recently when drawing the opprobrium of her fellow candidates for stating that the legal limit for terminating disabled foetuses should be reduced (https://bit.ly/39O54Aj).

Significantly, in 2019 renewed political focus led to sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 being repealed in Northern Ireland, legalising abortion there for the first time. While abortion in prescribed circumstances has been legal in the rest of the UK since 1967, a recent case at first instance R v W & Others, unreported, November 2019, St Albans Crown Court,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll