header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 March 2020 / Nicholas Whitehorn , Letitia Egan
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The law on abortion—time to re-think?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
17911
Letitia Egan & Nicholas Whitehorn review the evidence for reforming the abortion law in the UK
  • The anachronistic wording of s 58 OAPA 1861 renders the mens rea dangerously unclear and, worse still, risks criminalising vulnerable women.

For most parts of the UK, the issue of abortion appears to be a settled debate, but in reality it is a topic which continues to stir passions. This is something Labour leadership hopeful Rebecca Long-Bailey discovered recently when drawing the opprobrium of her fellow candidates for stating that the legal limit for terminating disabled foetuses should be reduced (https://bit.ly/39O54Aj).

Significantly, in 2019 renewed political focus led to sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 being repealed in Northern Ireland, legalising abortion there for the first time. While abortion in prescribed circumstances has been legal in the rest of the UK since 1967, a recent case at first instance R v W & Others, unreported, November 2019, St Albans Crown Court,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll