header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The law on abortion—time to re-think?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
19 March 2020 / Nicholas Whitehorn , Letitia Egan
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail
17911
Letitia Egan & Nicholas Whitehorn review the evidence for reforming the abortion law in the UK
  • The anachronistic wording of s 58 OAPA 1861 renders the mens rea dangerously unclear and, worse still, risks criminalising vulnerable women.

For most parts of the UK, the issue of abortion appears to be a settled debate, but in reality it is a topic which continues to stir passions. This is something Labour leadership hopeful Rebecca Long-Bailey discovered recently when drawing the opprobrium of her fellow candidates for stating that the legal limit for terminating disabled foetuses should be reduced (https://bit.ly/39O54Aj).

Significantly, in 2019 renewed political focus led to sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 being repealed in Northern Ireland, legalising abortion there for the first time. While abortion in prescribed circumstances has been legal in the rest of the UK since 1967, a recent case at first instance R v W & Others, unreported, November 2019, St Albans Crown Court,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll