header-logo header-logo

LexisPSL Analysis: The Singapore Mediation Convention

15 August 2019
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

The Singapore Mediation Convention: thoughts from the front line

  • The Singapore Convention on Mediation opened for signature on 7 August 2019. In this interview we discuss the Convention with Directors of the Singapore Ministry of Law—Natalie Morris-Sharma, (International Legal) and Sharon Ong (Policy Advisory). They provide their thoughts on the breadth of the Convention, its impact on Singapore as an international dispute resolution centre, and the wider implications for cross border disputes.

Will the Convention meet the needs of all countries or just those with an advanced mediation system?

A large number of countries were represented at the signing ceremony with 46 countries signing the Convention.  This includes the two biggest economic states of the United States and China. There are a number of other countries that stated their interest although it will be necessary to ensure that they have completed their relevant domestic processes and that their paperwork is verified by the United Nations before those countries will be able sign the convention.  

The Convention is a carefully negotiated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll