header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021 / Nick Leigh, Rosenblatt
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

The SKAT revenue rule decision

48964
Nick Leigh reports on the occasional eyebrow-raising qualities of tax law

The SKAT case is one of the biggest civil litigation claims before the English court. Mark that—was.

In a huge decision, the entire multi-billion pound matter has been disposed of at the first opportunity by the court.

The claims—SKAT is short for Skatteforvaltningen, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration—had been brought as part of a wide-reaching pursuit to recover circa £1.5bn lost in 2012 to 2015 to dividend tax reclaims SKAT alleged it was not liable to pay.

Its various causes of action—against more than 100 defendants in total—included allegations of fraud, negligent participation and negligent misstatement.

The litigation was so vast, the trial was anticipated to last more than a year. Two mini-trials to address preliminary issues that would subsequently inform the main proceedings were themselves on the scale of serious High Court litigation.

It is the first of such mini-trials that has given rise to the decision of Mr Justice Andrew

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll