header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021 / Nick Leigh, Rosenblatt
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

The SKAT revenue rule decision

48964
Nick Leigh reports on the occasional eyebrow-raising qualities of tax law

The SKAT case is one of the biggest civil litigation claims before the English court. Mark that—was.

In a huge decision, the entire multi-billion pound matter has been disposed of at the first opportunity by the court.

The claims—SKAT is short for Skatteforvaltningen, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration—had been brought as part of a wide-reaching pursuit to recover circa £1.5bn lost in 2012 to 2015 to dividend tax reclaims SKAT alleged it was not liable to pay.

Its various causes of action—against more than 100 defendants in total—included allegations of fraud, negligent participation and negligent misstatement.

The litigation was so vast, the trial was anticipated to last more than a year. Two mini-trials to address preliminary issues that would subsequently inform the main proceedings were themselves on the scale of serious High Court litigation.

It is the first of such mini-trials that has given rise to the decision of Mr Justice Andrew

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll