header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

There’s no place like home

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 July 2014 / Jennifer Kotilaine
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

A recent Court of Appeal ruling on residence is a significant one for local authorities, as Jennifer Kotilaine explains

The case of R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Wiltshire Council, South Gloucestershire Council, Somerset County Council [2014] EWCA Civ 12, [2014] All ER (D) 170 (Feb) concerns local authority duties in respect of severely incapacitated care leavers. In particular, it concerns the difference and relationship between the duty to assist in the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 23C and the duty to accommodate in the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), s 21.

It also clarifies the law relating to “ordinary residence” under s 24 of NAA 1948 where an individual lacks capacity to decide where to live, whether a care leaver or not.

Facts

P, born in Wiltshire on 27 December 1986, is a person with complex physical and severe learning disabilities. He does not speak and lacks capacity. In 1991, P was accommodated by Wiltshire Council at the request of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Dublin disputes team announces strategic partner appointment

DWF—four appointments

DWF—four appointments

Firm strengthens in-house advocacy with four new pupil appointments

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Scottish practice expands with new solicitor hire and trainee qualification

NEWS
Read All
Long wait ahead for improvement in parental leave
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
NLJ this week: Civil tweaks & courtroom quirks
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
NLJ this week: Gaslighting & post-separation assets
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
NLJ this week: Tackling CPS non-disclosure
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
NLJ this week: Lord Neuberger on assisted dying
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll