header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

There’s no place like home

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 July 2014 / Jennifer Kotilaine
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

A recent Court of Appeal ruling on residence is a significant one for local authorities, as Jennifer Kotilaine explains

The case of R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Wiltshire Council, South Gloucestershire Council, Somerset County Council [2014] EWCA Civ 12, [2014] All ER (D) 170 (Feb) concerns local authority duties in respect of severely incapacitated care leavers. In particular, it concerns the difference and relationship between the duty to assist in the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 23C and the duty to accommodate in the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), s 21.

It also clarifies the law relating to “ordinary residence” under s 24 of NAA 1948 where an individual lacks capacity to decide where to live, whether a care leaver or not.

Facts

P, born in Wiltshire on 27 December 1986, is a person with complex physical and severe learning disabilities. He does not speak and lacks capacity. In 1991, P was accommodated by Wiltshire Council at the request of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll