header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

There’s no place like home

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
11 July 2014 / Jennifer Kotilaine
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

A recent Court of Appeal ruling on residence is a significant one for local authorities, as Jennifer Kotilaine explains

The case of R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Wiltshire Council, South Gloucestershire Council, Somerset County Council [2014] EWCA Civ 12, [2014] All ER (D) 170 (Feb) concerns local authority duties in respect of severely incapacitated care leavers. In particular, it concerns the difference and relationship between the duty to assist in the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 23C and the duty to accommodate in the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), s 21.

It also clarifies the law relating to “ordinary residence” under s 24 of NAA 1948 where an individual lacks capacity to decide where to live, whether a care leaver or not.

Facts

P, born in Wiltshire on 27 December 1986, is a person with complex physical and severe learning disabilities. He does not speak and lacks capacity. In 1991, P was accommodated by Wiltshire Council at the request of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Police, contempt and the rule of law
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
NLJ this week: When your brain signs the contract
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
NLJ this week: Comparators—how close is close enough?
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
NLJ this week: Domicile—more than where you live
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
NLJ this week: Arbitration’s fast lane—with guardrails
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll