header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Third party inspection of Tomlin orders

Janna Purdie considers when courts can order inspection of the schedules annexed to Tomlin orders

Tomlin orders and confidentiality

The court may grant an order to a defendant allowing inspection of Tomlin order schedules reached between the claimant and other defendants. In doing so the court should respect the confidentiality of the parties to the Tomlin order.

Facts of the case

In an application brought under CPR 5.4B(1), eBay, one of the defendants, requested inspection of settlement agreements between the claimant and individual defendants, which were set out in the schedules to Tomlin orders. It was argued, on behalf of the eBay, that it was necessary and proportionate that eBay should be able to see the basis on which the claims had been settled by the claimant with the other defendants. The reason for this was that all of the defendants were joint tortfeasors. Therefore, unless the claimants had reserved their right in the settlement agreements to continue to pursue eBay, the settlement reached by the claimants with the other defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll