header-logo header-logo

Third party inspection of Tomlin orders

18 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers when courts can order inspection of the schedules annexed to Tomlin orders

Tomlin orders and confidentiality

The court may grant an order to a defendant allowing inspection of Tomlin order schedules reached between the claimant and other defendants. In doing so the court should respect the confidentiality of the parties to the Tomlin order.

Facts of the case

In an application brought under CPR 5.4B(1), eBay, one of the defendants, requested inspection of settlement agreements between the claimant and individual defendants, which were set out in the schedules to Tomlin orders. It was argued, on behalf of the eBay, that it was necessary and proportionate that eBay should be able to see the basis on which the claims had been settled by the claimant with the other defendants. The reason for this was that all of the defendants were joint tortfeasors. Therefore, unless the claimants had reserved their right in the settlement agreements to continue to pursue eBay, the settlement reached by the claimants with the other defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll