header-logo header-logo

Third party inspection of Tomlin orders

18 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers when courts can order inspection of the schedules annexed to Tomlin orders

Tomlin orders and confidentiality

The court may grant an order to a defendant allowing inspection of Tomlin order schedules reached between the claimant and other defendants. In doing so the court should respect the confidentiality of the parties to the Tomlin order.

Facts of the case

In an application brought under CPR 5.4B(1), eBay, one of the defendants, requested inspection of settlement agreements between the claimant and individual defendants, which were set out in the schedules to Tomlin orders. It was argued, on behalf of the eBay, that it was necessary and proportionate that eBay should be able to see the basis on which the claims had been settled by the claimant with the other defendants. The reason for this was that all of the defendants were joint tortfeasors. Therefore, unless the claimants had reserved their right in the settlement agreements to continue to pursue eBay, the settlement reached by the claimants with the other defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll