header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Third party motor claims: inception deception

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
01 September 2017 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Motor insurers must bear the risk of policyholder fraud, says Nicholas Bevan

  • Third party motor claims are immune to policyholder fraud or misrepresentation.
  • ​​ECJ ruling has far reaching implications for sections 151 and 152 Road Traffic Act 1988.

Can a motor insurer invoke its policyholder’s fraud to defend a third-party claim? ‘Yes’ according to the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) in both EUI Ltd v Bristol Alliance Ltd Partnership [2012] EWCA Civ 1267, [2012] All ER (D) 120 (Oct) and Sahin v Havard & anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1202, [2016] All ER (D) 21 (Dec). In both cases it was held that the compensatory guarantee imposed by s 151 of RTA 1988 can even be circumvented by contractual exclusions and restrictions in cover. However, this orthodoxy was turned on its head by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on 20 July 2017. The ECJ has ruled that a national laws that permit motor insurers to deny a third-party claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Alarm bells over Mazur
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Jury trial & a constitutional illusion
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
NLJ this week: The rise—and risks—of going private
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
NLJ this week: Human rights disputes push courts to redefine their role
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Debarment orders—shortcut or minefield?
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll