Third party motor claims: inception deception

Motor insurers must bear the risk of policyholder fraud, says Nicholas Bevan

Third party motor claims are immune to policyholder fraud or misrepresentation.
ECJ ruling has far reaching implications for sections 151 and 152 Road Traffic Act 1988.

Can a motor insurer invoke its policyholder’s fraud to defend a third-party claim? ‘Yes’ according to the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) in both EUI Ltd v Bristol Alliance Ltd Partnership [2012] EWCA Civ 1267, [2012] All ER (D) 120 (Oct) and Sahin v Havard & anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1202, [2016] All ER (D) 21 (Dec). In both cases it was held that the compensatory guarantee imposed by s 151 of RTA 1988 can even be circumvented by contractual exclusions and restrictions in cover. However, this orthodoxy was turned on its head by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on 20 July 2017. The ECJ has ruled that a national laws that permit motor insurers to deny a third-party claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Third party motor claims: inception deception

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Opinion , EU , Insurance / reinsurance

Motor insurers must bear the risk of policyholder fraud, says Nicholas Bevan

Third party motor claims are immune to policyholder fraud or misrepresentation.
ECJ ruling has far reaching implications for sections 151 and 152 Road Traffic Act 1988.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Reframing family dispute resolution

As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes

NLJ this week: Employment law updates on restraints, representation & tribunal boundaries

A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike

NLJ this week Civil way: Practical procedure lessons & cautionary tales

From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

NLJ this week: Fraud in the digital age

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

NLJ this week: Right outcome, troubling reasoning?

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct?

Error message

Third party motor claims: inception deception

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay