header-logo header-logo

Three kinds of private nuisance

01 December 2023 / Gordon Wignall
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
149548
Gordon Wignall outlines principles applicable to different types of private nuisance
  • Sets out themes common to private nuisance concerning physical damage to property, intangible interferences, and cases where nuisance is mixed with negligence.
  • Includes relevant caselaw.

Is it possible to set out any practical guidance in a summary as short as this as to those rules which govern an action in private nuisance, given the disparate factual circumstances to which this cause of action may apply? The answer is ‘yes’ and that in any event the effort is useful, if not essential, since we can then avoid pursuing inappropriate themes in the wrong types of claims.

This article identifies some elements common to all nuisance claims, but also suggests that distinct themes exist in respect of: (i) physical damage to property; (ii) ‘intangible’ interferences; and (iii) those cases where nuisance has become mixed with negligence. Such a categorisation is not entirely new, but rarely expressed. It constitutes the best roadmap available to enable us to follow judgments from the highest courts and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll