header-logo header-logo

Three kinds of private nuisance

01 December 2023 / Gordon Wignall
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
149548
Gordon Wignall outlines principles applicable to different types of private nuisance
  • Sets out themes common to private nuisance concerning physical damage to property, intangible interferences, and cases where nuisance is mixed with negligence.
  • Includes relevant caselaw.

Is it possible to set out any practical guidance in a summary as short as this as to those rules which govern an action in private nuisance, given the disparate factual circumstances to which this cause of action may apply? The answer is ‘yes’ and that in any event the effort is useful, if not essential, since we can then avoid pursuing inappropriate themes in the wrong types of claims.

This article identifies some elements common to all nuisance claims, but also suggests that distinct themes exist in respect of: (i) physical damage to property; (ii) ‘intangible’ interferences; and (iii) those cases where nuisance has become mixed with negligence. Such a categorisation is not entirely new, but rarely expressed. It constitutes the best roadmap available to enable us to follow judgments from the highest courts and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll