header-logo header-logo

01 December 2023 / Gordon Wignall
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Three kinds of private nuisance

149548
Gordon Wignall outlines principles applicable to different types of private nuisance
  • Sets out themes common to private nuisance concerning physical damage to property, intangible interferences, and cases where nuisance is mixed with negligence.
  • Includes relevant caselaw.

Is it possible to set out any practical guidance in a summary as short as this as to those rules which govern an action in private nuisance, given the disparate factual circumstances to which this cause of action may apply? The answer is ‘yes’ and that in any event the effort is useful, if not essential, since we can then avoid pursuing inappropriate themes in the wrong types of claims.

This article identifies some elements common to all nuisance claims, but also suggests that distinct themes exist in respect of: (i) physical damage to property; (ii) ‘intangible’ interferences; and (iii) those cases where nuisance has become mixed with negligence. Such a categorisation is not entirely new, but rarely expressed. It constitutes the best roadmap available to enable us to follow judgments from the highest courts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll