header-logo header-logo

09 September 2026
Issue: 8176 / Categories: Legal News , Dispute resolution , Legal services , Fees
printer mail-detail

Tiered fees for complaints could be costly

Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned

LeO plans to make law firms pay £200, £750 or £1,500 depending on the stage at which the complaint is resolved. Law firms could escape the fee only if the complaint was resolved in the lawyer’s favour or dismissed and LeO was satisfied the firm had taken all reasonable steps to resolve it at the first-tier stage.

However, CILEX president Sara Fowler expressed ‘concerns about firms being driven to make unwarranted payments over fears that a complaint going to the ombudsman will prove even more costly’. She called for ‘proportionate case fees and a fair process’.

Law Society president Mark Evans warned there was ‘a real risk that the proposals will encourage firms to settle complaints regardless of merit, simply because it is cheaper’.

LeO’s consultation, ‘Changes to scheme rules, case fees, and publication of ombudsman decisions’, closed last week.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll