header-logo header-logo

Time to act

25 November 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Child law , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer says local authorities must stand up for at-risk children

Children in care are among the most vulnerable children in our society. After the “Baby P” case, there has been much attention on the issue of when children who are at risk of abuse should be taken into care. Many local authority social services departments are now overwhelmed by child protection cases, and it is likely that the numbers of looked after children will rise as a result. However, evidence suggests that the “life chances” of looked-after children are poor.

One issue which has been considered by the civil courts recently is the duties owed to looked after children once they come into care. Among other things, do local authorities owe a duty of care to pursue financial and legal claims on behalf of such children? A child taken into care following sexual abuse will almost always be able to make a claim to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). However, the local authority, as the child’s legal “parent”, is likely to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll