header-logo header-logo

Time for renewal

29 July 2010 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Steven O’Sullivan advocates the policy of notification, notification, notification

As summer arrives, every firm must think about renewing their professional indemnity insurance on 1 October. Renewal has not been without its problems lately. The Law Society has recently produced a practice note for firms about renewal but they fail to talk about the annual trawl for claims and circumstances that forms part of the process. It’s sensible not to rely on renewal to unearth potential claims, but when should matters be notified generally?

What does the policy say?

Your policy will oblige you to notify a claim, loss, suspicion of dishonesty by someone in the firm, investigation or disciplinary proceedings and “circumstances”.

What does this mean in practice? In terms of claims, it’s easy to give guidance. If you receive communication from a client or their new solicitor that suggests that they are thinking of claiming from your firm, notify. The merits or otherwise of the suggestion are irrelevant: misconceived or outrageous allegations should equally be notified. There is no purpose in agonising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll