header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Giles Hutt , Alex Sciannaca
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Time for a spring clean?

huttsciannaca

Part 36 is in need of revision to make it more transparent for parties & their lawyers say Alex Sciannaca & Giles Hutt

The general view is that Pt 36, governing formal offers to settle, is one of the more successful parts of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), but is in urgent need of a spring clean. Since it was last revised in April 2007, a number of specific problems have arisen that need to be dealt with sooner rather than later, and some of the key provisions of Pt 36 are anyway needlessly technical and should be made a lot simpler. Excessive technicality leads to mistakes being made, and so many supposed “Pt 36 offers” are in reality no such thing, and may have only a marginal influence on any costs order made by the court—the opposite of the offeror’s expectations. At the same time, lack of clarity as to how Pt 36 works makes it less effective than it should be as a system of sticks and carrots

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll