header-logo header-logo

Group actions: Time to join forces?

13 May 2022 / David Niven , Nicole Blakey
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features , Profession , Collective action
printer mail-detail
81443
In the first of a special three-part series by Penningtons Manches Cooper, David Niven & Nicole Blakey sketch out the changing landscape of group actions & litigation funding in the UK
  • Increase in professional negligence and group actions in the High Court.
  • Conditional fee agreements and after-the-event insurance funding for group actions.
  • Emergence of third-party litigation funding for group actions.

Solomonic’s review of High Court litigation in 2021 revealed a substantial rise in professional negligence disputes, up 289% on 2020 with an increase in actions brought against solicitors and barristers. Group actions filed in the High Court increased by 27% from 2020 to 2021: this upward trend will likely continue.

These statistics are reflective of our own experience. We have seen a rise in professional negligence claims against solicitors and barristers brought by groups of claimants, predominately in relation to failed property investment schemes. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has taken disciplinary action over recent years against law firms involved in these schemes, so we may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll