header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / John Gould
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fees , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Time to retire Part III?

251062
© Getty images
John Gould examines whether the current regime for solicitor-client fee disputes has outlived its purpose
  • Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 is an outdated and overly technical framework for solicitor remuneration disputes that no longer reflects modern legal practice, regulation or consumer protection.
  • Solicitor-client fee disputes should instead be resolved through ordinary contractual principles, ADR and ombudsman redress, bringing solicitors into line with other legal and professional services.

The Civil Justice Council’s consultation on the reform of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 closes on 16 July 2026. Part III is important but esoteric. It establishes the legal framework for solicitor remuneration for both contentious (litigation) and non-contentious (such as conveyancing and probate) business. It sets out how fees are determined, how principles for non-contentious work are prescribed, and the rights of clients to challenge fees through court procedures.

Part III’s provisions are deeply rooted in another age, when if the courts didn’t prevent some Dickensian solicitor from ripping off his clients, there was no-one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll