header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / John Gould
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fees , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Time to retire Part III?

251062
© Getty images
John Gould examines whether the current regime for solicitor-client fee disputes has outlived its purpose
  • Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 is an outdated and overly technical framework for solicitor remuneration disputes that no longer reflects modern legal practice, regulation or consumer protection.
  • Solicitor-client fee disputes should instead be resolved through ordinary contractual principles, ADR and ombudsman redress, bringing solicitors into line with other legal and professional services.

The Civil Justice Council’s consultation on the reform of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 closes on 16 July 2026. Part III is important but esoteric. It establishes the legal framework for solicitor remuneration for both contentious (litigation) and non-contentious (such as conveyancing and probate) business. It sets out how fees are determined, how principles for non-contentious work are prescribed, and the rights of clients to challenge fees through court procedures.

Part III’s provisions are deeply rooted in another age, when if the courts didn’t prevent some Dickensian solicitor from ripping off his clients, there was no-one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll