header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / John Gould
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fees , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Time to retire Part III?

251062
© Getty images
John Gould examines whether the current regime for solicitor-client fee disputes has outlived its purpose
  • Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 is an outdated and overly technical framework for solicitor remuneration disputes that no longer reflects modern legal practice, regulation or consumer protection.
  • Solicitor-client fee disputes should instead be resolved through ordinary contractual principles, ADR and ombudsman redress, bringing solicitors into line with other legal and professional services.

The Civil Justice Council’s consultation on the reform of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 closes on 16 July 2026. Part III is important but esoteric. It establishes the legal framework for solicitor remuneration for both contentious (litigation) and non-contentious (such as conveyancing and probate) business. It sets out how fees are determined, how principles for non-contentious work are prescribed, and the rights of clients to challenge fees through court procedures.

Part III’s provisions are deeply rooted in another age, when if the courts didn’t prevent some Dickensian solicitor from ripping off his clients, there was no-one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll