header-logo header-logo

13 August 2019 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Time to start over or time to stop?

Alec Samuels sets out the arguments in favour of & those against a retrial

  • Arguments in favour of retrial and the importance to victims.
  • Arguments against a retrial and the impact on the defendant.
  • The very unusual circumstances of a second re-trial.
  • A re-trial following the quashing of an acquittal.

The jury failed to reach a verdict. The judge is asked by the prosecution to order a retrial. How should he exercise his discretion?

The arguments in favour of retrial

The charge may have been quite serious. It would certainly have been seen as important to the victims. There may be a reasonable prospect of conviction.  The law requires a verdict, the truth should be known, one way or another, the situation calls for finality and closure. A verdict would be in the public interest. The public need to know. The victims want to know what happened, and who, if anybody, is responsible. The defendant has not been convicted, he is still ‘innocent’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll