header-logo header-logo

13 August 2019 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Time to start over or time to stop?

Alec Samuels sets out the arguments in favour of & those against a retrial

  • Arguments in favour of retrial and the importance to victims.
  • Arguments against a retrial and the impact on the defendant.
  • The very unusual circumstances of a second re-trial.
  • A re-trial following the quashing of an acquittal.

The jury failed to reach a verdict. The judge is asked by the prosecution to order a retrial. How should he exercise his discretion?

The arguments in favour of retrial

The charge may have been quite serious. It would certainly have been seen as important to the victims. There may be a reasonable prospect of conviction.  The law requires a verdict, the truth should be known, one way or another, the situation calls for finality and closure. A verdict would be in the public interest. The public need to know. The victims want to know what happened, and who, if anybody, is responsible. The defendant has not been convicted, he is still ‘innocent’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll