header-logo header-logo

18 March 2011 / Jenny Afia , Phil Hartley
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tipping the balance

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg’s speech, ‘Restoring Civil Liberties’, delivered before an audience of libel reform hopefuls in January...

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg’s speech, ‘Restoring Civil Liberties’, delivered before an audience of libel reform hopefuls in January, repeated an assertion that has become something of a cliché in discussions of England’s libel laws. He said: “It is a farce—and an international embarrassment—that the American Congress has felt it necessary to legislate to protect their citizens from our libel laws.”

Not so. On the international stage—that is, around the world, not just in America—our libel laws are highly regarded. Indeed they provide the legal model for a majority of common law countries. Constitutionally and philosophically, we are of a different make up from the US. Inscribed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a presumption in favour of freedom of expression. This is alien to our own (and Europe’s) model which strikes a fine balance between the right to reputation in Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll