header-logo header-logo

18 March 2011 / Jenny Afia , Phil Hartley
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tipping the balance

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg’s speech, ‘Restoring Civil Liberties’, delivered before an audience of libel reform hopefuls in January...

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg’s speech, ‘Restoring Civil Liberties’, delivered before an audience of libel reform hopefuls in January, repeated an assertion that has become something of a cliché in discussions of England’s libel laws. He said: “It is a farce—and an international embarrassment—that the American Congress has felt it necessary to legislate to protect their citizens from our libel laws.”

Not so. On the international stage—that is, around the world, not just in America—our libel laws are highly regarded. Indeed they provide the legal model for a majority of common law countries. Constitutionally and philosophically, we are of a different make up from the US. Inscribed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is a presumption in favour of freedom of expression. This is alien to our own (and Europe’s) model which strikes a fine balance between the right to reputation in Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll