header-logo header-logo

Too high a price

20 June 2013 / Theo Richardson-Gool
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
rexfeatures_1374584a

Plans to reform whiplash claims will marginalise victims, says Theo Richardson-Gool

Later this year, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is likely to come to a decision over its plans to increase the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, for victims of road traffic accidents. The government has made a commitment to tackle fraudulent whiplash claims and reduce consequent legal costs. More recently, there has been speculation that this limit could be raised as high as £15,000 for all personal injury claims.

By raising the claims threshold, the government believes most whiplash claims will go through the small claims court, and thus prevent rising insurance premiums and reduce costs for defendants (often insurers) when challenging fraudulent whiplash claims. The impetus is for personal injury victims to either represent themselves or bear the costs of legal representation, as opposed to insurers paying for such costs under the current rules.

The MoJ has been spurred on by estimates from insurers that whiplash claims add £90 a year to the average motor insurance policy, although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll