header-logo header-logo

Too high a price

20 June 2013 / Theo Richardson-Gool
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
rexfeatures_1374584a

Plans to reform whiplash claims will marginalise victims, says Theo Richardson-Gool

Later this year, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is likely to come to a decision over its plans to increase the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, for victims of road traffic accidents. The government has made a commitment to tackle fraudulent whiplash claims and reduce consequent legal costs. More recently, there has been speculation that this limit could be raised as high as £15,000 for all personal injury claims.

By raising the claims threshold, the government believes most whiplash claims will go through the small claims court, and thus prevent rising insurance premiums and reduce costs for defendants (often insurers) when challenging fraudulent whiplash claims. The impetus is for personal injury victims to either represent themselves or bear the costs of legal representation, as opposed to insurers paying for such costs under the current rules.

The MoJ has been spurred on by estimates from insurers that whiplash claims add £90 a year to the average motor insurance policy, although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll