header-logo header-logo

19 November 2021 / John Gould
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Too late to close the box?

64401
John Gould examines the troubling implications for privacy & the rule of law when vast swathes of information are released in the name of transparency

It is a journalistic meme that very rich people don’t play by the rules. Their financial affairs are likely to be complex and obscure, crossing many borders and tailored by professionals to their client’s advantage. Some may have obtained great wealth from crime or corruption, and some may not have paid all their tax. Some may profess no personal social responsibility, and some may be hypocrites.

Offshore jurisdictions sit beyond the reach of national laws and policemen and harbour, we are led to believe—an amorphous mass of white-collar criminality and sharp practice. Politicians do nothing, it is suggested, because they are part of the same establishment system of double standards.

Confronted with this injustice and systemic abuse, surely direct action by right-thinking individuals and organisations is amply justified. Exposure and public opprobrium are not only deserved, but are what people want to read about.

Does

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll