header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015 / Henrietta Mason
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

​Tools of the trade

nlj_7657_mason

Henrietta Mason considers recent procedural developments in contentious succession

The last six months have seen some interesting substantive law developments in the disputed wills field, most notably the clarification of the appropriate test for testamentary capacity in Re Walker (Deceased) [2015] WTLR 493, and more recently, the reining in of the expanded doctrine of Donatio Mortis Causa by the Court of Appeal in King v Chiltern Dog Rescue [2015] EWCA Civ 581, [2015] All ER (D) 105 (Jun). While substantive developments are exciting and covered widely in the legal press, it pays not to overlook interesting procedural aspects, which can be used to bolster the litigator’s toolkit. There have been a few of note over the last year.

Taylor v Bell

Taylor v Bell [2015] EW Misc B3 (CC) provides an unusual example of an application to vary a consent order in relation to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). Mr Gardiner’s will made no provision for his son, Miles Taylor, who therefore applied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll