header-logo header-logo

27 February 2009 / All England Law Reporters
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Case law , Environment , Law reports , Property
printer mail-detail

Town and country planning—Trees—Definition

Palm Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2009] EWHC 220 (Admin), [2009] EWHC 220 (Admin)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Cranston J, 13 February 2009

The proceedings concerned a site owned by the claimant. The defendant local authority made a tree preservation order in respect of the site, following the sample order in the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Trees) Regulations 1999, (SI 1999/1892) (TCR 1999).

In 2006, the claimant applied for consent to do certain works which included the removal of saplings below a specified size and the removal of trees in order to create a clear corridor along the side of the wharf. The authority refused the application. An appeal to the secretary of state was dismissed on the recommendation of the secretary of state’s inspector, after a public inquiry.

The inspector’s report referred to the policy for considering applications for works to woodlands as set out in the secretary of state’s guidance on tree preservation orders. She identified

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll