header-logo header-logo

09 March 2017
Issue: 7737 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

Winters v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2017] EWHC 357 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 20 (Mar)

The Planning Court dismissed the claimant’s application to quash the decision of the inspector appointed by the first defendant Secretary of State, dismissing her appeal against the second defendant local planning authority’s refusal to grant prior approval for an extension to her house. The challenge to the inspector’s conclusion, that works on constructing the extension had begun before the claimant had applied to the authority, contrary to condition A.4(2) of Pt 1 of Sch 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (SI 2015/596), failed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll