header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Tracking the legal market

Employment, tax and commercial law practices have continued to grow during the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit at a slower rate than in Q1, according to the second LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index, which tracks legal activity levels.

However, property, immigration, crime and litigation have been the areas of law hardest hit.

Just as gross domestic product (GDP) tracks the level of output in the overall economy, the GLP Index tracks a basket of metrics which are representative of legal activity levels. The latest index, released this week, found an overall legal market decline of 6.9% in Q2 2020.

The change to new ways of working, as well as workplace uncertainty and restructures, have increased the need for legal advice, creating 4% growth in employment law. Tax law enjoyed almost 14% growth, perhaps benefiting from the furlough scheme and government backed loans, and commercial was one of the best overall performing areas.

An expected surge in restructuring and insolvency work had not materialised midway through the year―this practice area declined by more than 18%.

Property law activity was 31% lower than in 2019, with the housing market brought to a near-standstill by the spring lockdown. The closure of courts and move to remote justice for urgent cases has also taken its toll on dispute resolution and litigation, which fell by 20% in civil and family disputes, while the throughput of court fell by 75%. The GDL Index model predicts that, while there is likely to be pent-up demand, the bounce back is likely to be small and short.

The Index report’s author, Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis, said: ‘The report has brought data and insight to the legal industry. Complicated and difficult decisions lie ahead.

‘The GLP will give firms the chance to review their market positioning, see how they are performing and chart a route to future growth.’

The report can be viewed here.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll