header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Tracking the legal market

Employment, tax and commercial law practices have continued to grow during the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit at a slower rate than in Q1, according to the second LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index, which tracks legal activity levels.

However, property, immigration, crime and litigation have been the areas of law hardest hit.

Just as gross domestic product (GDP) tracks the level of output in the overall economy, the GLP Index tracks a basket of metrics which are representative of legal activity levels. The latest index, released this week, found an overall legal market decline of 6.9% in Q2 2020.

The change to new ways of working, as well as workplace uncertainty and restructures, have increased the need for legal advice, creating 4% growth in employment law. Tax law enjoyed almost 14% growth, perhaps benefiting from the furlough scheme and government backed loans, and commercial was one of the best overall performing areas.

An expected surge in restructuring and insolvency work had not materialised midway through the year―this practice area declined by more than 18%.

Property law activity was 31% lower than in 2019, with the housing market brought to a near-standstill by the spring lockdown. The closure of courts and move to remote justice for urgent cases has also taken its toll on dispute resolution and litigation, which fell by 20% in civil and family disputes, while the throughput of court fell by 75%. The GDL Index model predicts that, while there is likely to be pent-up demand, the bounce back is likely to be small and short.

The Index report’s author, Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis, said: ‘The report has brought data and insight to the legal industry. Complicated and difficult decisions lie ahead.

‘The GLP will give firms the chance to review their market positioning, see how they are performing and chart a route to future growth.’

The report can be viewed here.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll