header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Tracking the legal market

Employment, tax and commercial law practices have continued to grow during the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit at a slower rate than in Q1, according to the second LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index, which tracks legal activity levels.

However, property, immigration, crime and litigation have been the areas of law hardest hit.

Just as gross domestic product (GDP) tracks the level of output in the overall economy, the GLP Index tracks a basket of metrics which are representative of legal activity levels. The latest index, released this week, found an overall legal market decline of 6.9% in Q2 2020.

The change to new ways of working, as well as workplace uncertainty and restructures, have increased the need for legal advice, creating 4% growth in employment law. Tax law enjoyed almost 14% growth, perhaps benefiting from the furlough scheme and government backed loans, and commercial was one of the best overall performing areas.

An expected surge in restructuring and insolvency work had not materialised midway through the year―this practice area declined by more than 18%.

Property law activity was 31% lower than in 2019, with the housing market brought to a near-standstill by the spring lockdown. The closure of courts and move to remote justice for urgent cases has also taken its toll on dispute resolution and litigation, which fell by 20% in civil and family disputes, while the throughput of court fell by 75%. The GDL Index model predicts that, while there is likely to be pent-up demand, the bounce back is likely to be small and short.

The Index report’s author, Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis, said: ‘The report has brought data and insight to the legal industry. Complicated and difficult decisions lie ahead.

‘The GLP will give firms the chance to review their market positioning, see how they are performing and chart a route to future growth.’

The report can be viewed here.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll