header-logo header-logo

08 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trade mark

Biotronik SE & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-416/11 [2013] All ER (D) 324 (Oct)

It was well established that in order to examine whether use of an earlier trade mark was genuine, an overall assessment should be carried out which took account of all the relevant factors in the particular case. Genuine use of a trade mark could not be proved by means of probabilities or suppositions, but had to be demonstrated by solid and objective evidence of actual and sufficient use of the trade mark on the market concerned. However, it could not be ruled out that an accumulation of items of evidence might allow the necessary facts to be established, even though each of those items of evidence, considered in isolation, would be insufficient to constitute proof of the accuracy of those facts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll