header-logo header-logo

Transparency at the Bar

04 July 2019
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Professional rules compelling barristers to be more transparent about pricing and services have come into force.

Barristers must comply by 1 January 2020, after which the Bar Standards Board (BSB) will conduct spot-checks. The rules, published in a revised edition of the Handbook this week, require all self-employed barristers, chambers and BSB-regulated entities to make certain information publicly available, including which types of legal service they provide, their most commonly used pricing models (such as fixed fee or hourly rate) and details of their clients’ rights of redress. Public Access barristers providing certain types of services are also required to publish additional price and service information.

BSB Director of Strategy and Policy, Ewen MacLeod, said the new rules would ‘enable the public to make more informed decisions before engaging a barrister’. The BSB will focus on ensuring compliance rather than disciplinary action.

Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll