header-logo header-logo

Transparency in the family courts

19 November 2021 / Paul Linsell
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
64423
Paul Linsell asks whether proposals for increased transparency could have unintended consequences
  • The intimate nature of the disputes that arise in family courts make the balance of individual confidentiality and the transparency to the public a thorny issue.
  • The president of the Family Division has produced a roadmap on how to achieve openness and confidentiality.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, published his much-anticipated report about opening up the family courts to greater transparency and reporting last month.

Entitled ‘Confidence and confidentiality: transparency in the family courts, it is clear from the outset that the recommendations set out represent a significant shift in direction for the family court. Many have referred to it as a complete change in culture.

Transparency & confidentiality

The report does not skirt around the difficulties in opening up the family courts to greater transparency. After all, how to manage the tension between doing just that while maintaining confidentiality for individuals has been the debate that has raged for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll