header-logo header-logo

Transparency Rules: who, what & how much?

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

New transparency rules to take effect in December 2018

The Solicitors Regulatory Association (SRA) has spelled out the range of price and service information law firms must publish under the new Transparency Rules due to take effect in December.

Law firms must say how long a quoted service might typically take and provide details of the experience and qualifications of staff who will be doing the work, the SRA states in guidance published this week. Firms must post the information in a prominent, clearly signposted location on their website. Any solicitor or firm without a website must make the information available immediately in any format for any member of the public who requests it. The SRA guidance says the Transparency Rules will apply to: conveyancing; probate; motoring offences; employment tribunals (claims for unfair or wrongful dismissal); immigration (excluding asylum); debt recovery (up to £100,000); and licensing applications for business premises.

Meanwhile, research published by the SRA this week and compiled by YouGov and Europe Economics suggested that publishing prices might boost business. A survey of about 1,000 small businesses found that they overestimated the cost of using a solicitor by 22%.

Nearly seven in ten small businesses said cost was a barrier to using a solicitor and nearly half of small businesses shop around online for legal services. When prices were published, therefore, assumptions on what solicitors cost fell and more small businesses said they would use a law firm compared to other legal services providers. The SRA said the findings echoed those of previous research which found that the majority of the public (70%) wanted to shop around, but were frustrated by the lack of accessible information available.

Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll