header-logo header-logo

26 November 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Treasury gives money for cases backlog

The justice system received a boost of about £500m in the Treasury Spending Review

The Treasury’s settlement with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), this week, included an extra £337m for the criminal justice system in England and Wales, of which £275m aims to ‘manage the downstream demand impact of 20,000 additional police officers and reduce backlogs in the Crown Court caused by COVID-19’.

An extra £105m will be spent on improvements to the court estate. An extra £40m will support victims of crime, including victims of domestic abuse. An extra £119m will support the wider justice system in responding to COVID-19, of which £76m goes to tackle backlogs of cases at the Family Court and employment tribunals, and £43m will help ensure courts and prisons resist the spread of Coronavirus.

Chair of the Bar Council, Amanda Pinto QC, described the extra funding as ‘a ray of hope in terms of fixing the many problems our justice system faces’.

She said: ‘It is a sign that this government understands the importance of investing in the entire justice system from start to finish. This injection of funding will make a difference in the short-term, and a number of today’s announcements reflect what the Bar Council recommended to the Treasury.

‘But it must not be a flash in the pan: to tackle the significant challenges in the courts and wider justice system, including the backlogs in the criminal courts, which are the inevitable consequence of decades of under-investment, the government must now ensure the system is sustainable in the long-term to ensure access to justice for everyone.’

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘We called for extra funds to make the justice system sustainable. We are pleased the chancellor has listened and adopted our recommendations.

‘Justice in this country was in a dire situation already before the pandemic, and is under pressure now like never before, so the £275m pledged to reduce persistent Crown Court backlogs has come not a moment too soon.’

Greene highlighted figures published by legal information provider LexisNexis, whose Gross Legal Product Index quantifies legal demand growth and the impact of COVID-19.

According to the Index, criminal lawyers have a ‘starkly negative’ outlook. Criminal litigation is down by 18% and Crown cases and trial volumes are down almost 30% since 2017, while the volume of appellants has fallen by 27% and appeals by more than 30%. Magistrates’ cases have fallen by 9% while court activity is down because of social distancing requirements.

Between 2010 and 2020, 38% of the criminal legal aid provider base disappeared, meaning criminal lawyers had less resilience in the face of the pandemic and were hit particularly hard.

Greene welcomed the Treasury investment, which would help ‘in the short term’, and said it would be essential to move at pace on the Criminal Legal Aid Review to give firms confidence to hang on through the downturn.

He said: ‘Without a sustainable criminal legal aid profession victims and defendants will be unable to access the legal advice they rely on.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll