header-logo header-logo

Trouble brewing over Equalities Bill proposals

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Legal news

 The government will have an uphill struggle persuading businesses to embrace the proposals for the Equalities Bill, lawyers predict.

Proposed measures for the Bill, which is expected to be published in October, would allow employers to discriminate in favour of female or ethnic minority job candidates and ban contractual prohibitions on staff discussing pay with each other.

Pinsent Masons partner, Ashley Norman, says: “Unless there are clear guidelines as to how a business could positively discriminate in certain circumstances, businesses will probably continue as normal.”

Rachel Dineley, employment partner at Beachcroft LLP says: “The government will need to ensure the amendments to the existing law don’t simply create uncertainty, with a whole raft of new questions around the possible interpretations of key wordings.”

She says one of the most significant anticipated changes is the requirement for all public sector bodies—and those firms with public sector contracts—to publish figures showing the gender pay gap.

“Although they will not need to publish actual figures—just the percentage difference—this could have an enormous impact on employers as it will create extra work at a time when resources may already be stretched, and may well cause tensions in the workplace.”

She says the age discrimination proposals could significantly affect healthcare and insurance provision.

“The refusal of some types of cover simply on the basis of age may become a thing of the past. However, higher insurance premiums for older people will continue to be allowed where justified.

“…the new Bill may go much further than originally expected, in requiring the provision of expensive treatments to the elderly where these have previously been refused, on the grounds of their age. This is likely to present the medical profession with difficult ethical dilemmas, where funds and resources are limited and choices between patients have to be made and priorities determined.”

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll