header-logo header-logo

Trouble brewing over Equalities Bill proposals

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Legal news

 The government will have an uphill struggle persuading businesses to embrace the proposals for the Equalities Bill, lawyers predict.

Proposed measures for the Bill, which is expected to be published in October, would allow employers to discriminate in favour of female or ethnic minority job candidates and ban contractual prohibitions on staff discussing pay with each other.

Pinsent Masons partner, Ashley Norman, says: “Unless there are clear guidelines as to how a business could positively discriminate in certain circumstances, businesses will probably continue as normal.”

Rachel Dineley, employment partner at Beachcroft LLP says: “The government will need to ensure the amendments to the existing law don’t simply create uncertainty, with a whole raft of new questions around the possible interpretations of key wordings.”

She says one of the most significant anticipated changes is the requirement for all public sector bodies—and those firms with public sector contracts—to publish figures showing the gender pay gap.

“Although they will not need to publish actual figures—just the percentage difference—this could have an enormous impact on employers as it will create extra work at a time when resources may already be stretched, and may well cause tensions in the workplace.”

She says the age discrimination proposals could significantly affect healthcare and insurance provision.

“The refusal of some types of cover simply on the basis of age may become a thing of the past. However, higher insurance premiums for older people will continue to be allowed where justified.

“…the new Bill may go much further than originally expected, in requiring the provision of expensive treatments to the elderly where these have previously been refused, on the grounds of their age. This is likely to present the medical profession with difficult ethical dilemmas, where funds and resources are limited and choices between patients have to be made and priorities determined.”

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll