header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Trouble brewing over Equalities Bill proposals

Legal news

 The government will have an uphill struggle persuading businesses to embrace the proposals for the Equalities Bill, lawyers predict.

Proposed measures for the Bill, which is expected to be published in October, would allow employers to discriminate in favour of female or ethnic minority job candidates and ban contractual prohibitions on staff discussing pay with each other.

Pinsent Masons partner, Ashley Norman, says: “Unless there are clear guidelines as to how a business could positively discriminate in certain circumstances, businesses will probably continue as normal.”

Rachel Dineley, employment partner at Beachcroft LLP says: “The government will need to ensure the amendments to the existing law don’t simply create uncertainty, with a whole raft of new questions around the possible interpretations of key wordings.”

She says one of the most significant anticipated changes is the requirement for all public sector bodies—and those firms with public sector contracts—to publish figures showing the gender pay gap.

“Although they will not need to publish actual figures—just the percentage difference—this could have an enormous impact on employers as it will create extra work at a time when resources may already be stretched, and may well cause tensions in the workplace.”

She says the age discrimination proposals could significantly affect healthcare and insurance provision.

“The refusal of some types of cover simply on the basis of age may become a thing of the past. However, higher insurance premiums for older people will continue to be allowed where justified.

“…the new Bill may go much further than originally expected, in requiring the provision of expensive treatments to the elderly where these have previously been refused, on the grounds of their age. This is likely to present the medical profession with difficult ethical dilemmas, where funds and resources are limited and choices between patients have to be made and priorities determined.”

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll