header-logo header-logo

11 September 2015 / Richard Lissack KC , Fiona Horlick
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Trying to stay afloat

nlj_7667_lissack_horlick

Post Deepwater, Richard Lissack QC & Fiona Horlick review the implications of the Offshore Installations (Offshore Safety Directive) (Safety Case) Regulations 2015

In April 2010, BP’s Deepwater Horizon oilrig exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico, killing a number of people and causing the largest marine oil spill in the history of the industry. This disaster prompted the European Commission to look at the safety of offshore oil and gas activities, initially concluding that there was inadequate assurance that the existing regulatory framework and industry safety practices minimised risk from offshore accidents.

OSD

Three years after Deepwater the EC published the Directive on Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations (OSD). This aimed to reduce and limit both the occurrence and consequences of major offshore accidents. The scope of the OSD required changes to safety regimes and to other areas such as emergency response and environmental protection.

Although many of the OSD’s requirements matched the existing Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3117) (the 2005 Regulations), which apply to both external and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll