header-logo header-logo

11 September 2015 / Richard Lissack KC , Fiona Horlick
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Trying to stay afloat

nlj_7667_lissack_horlick

Post Deepwater, Richard Lissack QC & Fiona Horlick review the implications of the Offshore Installations (Offshore Safety Directive) (Safety Case) Regulations 2015

In April 2010, BP’s Deepwater Horizon oilrig exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico, killing a number of people and causing the largest marine oil spill in the history of the industry. This disaster prompted the European Commission to look at the safety of offshore oil and gas activities, initially concluding that there was inadequate assurance that the existing regulatory framework and industry safety practices minimised risk from offshore accidents.

OSD

Three years after Deepwater the EC published the Directive on Safety of Offshore Oil and Gas Operations (OSD). This aimed to reduce and limit both the occurrence and consequences of major offshore accidents. The scope of the OSD required changes to safety regimes and to other areas such as emergency response and environmental protection.

Although many of the OSD’s requirements matched the existing Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3117) (the 2005 Regulations), which apply to both external and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll